| Agronomic Information Index |
Applying Zinc in
Fluid Fertilizers
By George Rehm and Gary Hergert Reprinted from Agrichemical Age
The importance of Zinc (Zn) fertilizers for row
crop production on some soils has been recognized for many years. Over these years,
researchers have described the general situations where a response to this essential
micronutrient can be expected. In addition, many trials have been conducted to measure the
effectiveness of various sources of Zinc on the market. In the large majority
of these trials, the Zinc sources were broadcast in either a granular or powdered form.
The nature and magnitude of the response to Zinc may be dependent upon the particle size
of the Zinc source. As fluid fertilizers became more popular, there was a parallel
development of Zinc sources which could be applied with these fertilizers. Therefore, we
initiated trials to evaluate the effectiveness of several Zinc sources applied in fluid
fertilizers. We chose to use suspension materials to eliminate any possible effect of
particle size on crop response to this nutrient.
Soil pH
Soil pH also affects the availability of Zinc.
Therefore sites having widely different chemical properties were chosen for the study.
Corn was grown under center pivot sprinkler irrigation on both acid and alareous sands. In 1974, four Zinc
sources (EDTA-Zinc, Nulex Liquid Zinc, ZnO, ZnSO4) were used to supply 0, 1.5, 3.0
and 6.0 lbs. Zn/acre. These same carriers were used to supply 0, .1, 1.0, 3.0 and 6.0 lbs.
Zn/acre in 1975. In 1976, the NZN product was added to the study and the 6.0 lb./are rate
of Zinc was discontinued. The basic suspension was made for 10-34-0, 28-0-0, 0-0-62, and
contained 2-1/2% clay. The final analysis was an 8-20-6. All Zinc sources were added to
this suspension to provide the required concentration of Zinc. This suspension was applied
to the side of and below the seed at a rate of 200 lbs./acre at planting. Positioning of the fluid fertilizer in this way provided for an ideal
relationship between the fertilizer placement and the root system of the corn crop.
Doubled
Yield
Corn yields were improved by application of fertilizer
Zinc at the site having an acid pH (Table 1) as well as the sites having a calcareous pH
(Table 2). With placement below and to the side of the seed, small amounts of
fertilizer Zinc were needed to produce maximum yield in 1974.
The positioning of 1.0 lb. Zinc per are in this manner produced maximum yields in both
1975 and 1976. It's important to point out that the use of .1 lb. Zinc per are
doubled yields in 1976. When this nutrient is deficient in soils, only small amounts of
Zinc are needed if it is placed close to the seed at planting. |
| TABLE 3. Effect of rate of applied Zinc on yield of corn grown on an
irrigated sandy soil having an acid pH. |
| Zinc Applied
Pounds per Acre |
Yield
Bushels #2 corn per Acre |
| 0 |
152 |
| 1.5 |
170 |
| 3.0 |
165 |
| 6.0 |
168 |
|
| TABLE 2. Effect of rate of applied Zinc on yield of corn on irrigated
sandy soils having pH greater than 7.0. |
| |
YieldBushels #2 corn per Acre |
| Zinc Applied
Pounds per Acre |
1975 |
1976 |
Average |
| 0 |
101 |
62 |
82 |
| 0.1 |
107 |
130 |
119 |
| 0.3 |
119 |
135 |
127 |
| 1.0 |
130 |
139 |
135 |
| 3.0 |
122 |
142 |
132 |
|
Various
stages of Zinc deficiency were observed in 1976. The leaf showing the most severe
deficiency symptom is on the far left. Deficiency symptoms gradually disappear toward the
right side of the photo.
Broadcast Application
Zinc deficiencies can also be
corrected by the broadcast application of various Zinc materials. In studies where dry
materials were used, higher rates of Zinc were needed when Zinc fertilizers were broadcast
and incorporated in the plow layer rather than applied below the seed at planting.
Although broadcast applications of fluid Zinc fertilizer were not evaluated in our
studies, there is no reason to suspect that higher rates of Zinc will not be needed when
fluid materials are broadcast and incorporated with the soil.
What soure of Zinc
should be used? Is one source of Zinc more effective than another? These are
questions the grower and the dealer are asking.
Several sources of Zinc were
compared in this study. In all cases, there was no statistical difference among the
sources evaluated when yields from all rates of applied Zinc were considered (Table 3).
There was some variation in the yields. This variation, however, was due to natural
variation of yields in the field rather than the source of Zinc applied. The data
colleted in this study show that all sources of Zinc are equally effective for corn
production when applied in a fluid fertilizer below and to the side of the seed. |
| TABLE 3. Effect of source of Zinc on yield of corn grown on irrigated
sandy soils. |
| |
YieldBushels #2 corn per Acre |
| Zinc Source |
1974 |
1975 |
1976 |
Average |
| EDTA |
164 |
119 |
143 |
142 |
| Nulex |
165 |
125 |
133 |
141 |
| ZnO |
161 |
121 |
132 |
139 |
| ZnSO4 |
164 |
114 |
137 |
138 |
| NZN |
|
|
136 |
|
|
| Fluid
sources of Zinc can add flexibility to a fertilizer program. In addition to either
broadcast or application in starter fertilizer, fluid sources of Zinc can be applied with
irrigation water which has a low salt content. The choice of a product for this situation
should be based on its properties.
It's important to emphasize,
however, that the application of Zinc with the irrigation water should be considered only
as an emergency measure. This method of application should be used only if Zinc deficiency
symptoms have been observed in the field. More efficient use of Zinc can be achieved if it
is placed either below or below and to the side of the seed at planting. |
| Agronomic Information Index |